On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 09:53 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:

On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 14:17 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:

quoted

Is it possible to get this patch through and before 2.6.31 stable is
released ?

Hi David,

Hm, I was ignoring this until I was sure all the last-minute fixes for
2.6.31 were out of the way; I was planning to submit it for 2.6.32.

Do we really need to submit it for 2.6.31? It's not a regression, is it?
It's been like this for _ages_.

True. But it gives annoying build fails on randconfig next trees. And
we(Sachin & myself) has been reporting it from March/April. If you feel
there is still room to be pushed to 2.6.31, then please do it. Else,
2.6.32 will be fine. Thanks for your support.

Regards--
Subrata