Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 3 authors, 2009-05-26

Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH v2] can: SJA1000: generic OF platform bus driver

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: 2009-05-26 09:10:30
Also in: linux-devicetree, netdev

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

On Monday 25 May 2009, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
quoted
Right, that makes sense. However, most drivers use the field to store the
physical address, not the iomap token. Maybe there should be a new field
in struct sja1000_priv for the virtual address, but that would be a change
to the base driver, not just to the OF portion.
Is that common practice? If yes, I will add a member to store the
virtual address to struct sja1000_priv.
I grepped through the network driver for usage of ->base_addr, and
it's somewhat inconsistent. The majority of the users use it for
a physical address, but there are also a few that use it for the
__iomem token.

Casts between unsigned long and qualified (__iomem, __user, const, ...)
pointers do not cause a warning, but can easily lead to bugs when
another user casts to an unqualified pointer.

	Arnd <><
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help