On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 05:43:25PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
[...]

quoted

bd == ugeth->confBd[txQ]
and
!in_be32((u32 __iomem *)(bd+4))

Are not equivalent wrt. speed. MMIO accessors should be rather
slow comparing to normal memory.

Yes, I know. I did it this way because I something broke under stress
when ugeth->confBd[txQ] instead. The ucc_geth_tx() and 
ucc_geth_start_xmit()
gets out of sync somehow.

Would be great if you could investigate it more. Maybe there is
a serious bug somewhere, or maybe you're introducing another
(yet hidden) bug...

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2