Re: [PATCH] cpumask: use mm_cpumask() wrapper: powerpc
From: Rusty Russell <hidden>
Date: 2009-03-23 05:43:22
On Friday 20 March 2009 17:06:17 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 14:46 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:quoted
Makes code futureproof against the impending change to mm->cpu_vm_mask. =20 It's also a chance to use the new cpumask_ ops which take a pointer (the older ones are deprecated, but there's no hurry for arch code).=20 Boom :-) =20 In file included from /home/benh/linux-powerpc-test/arch/powerpc/kernel/v=
dso.c:30:
/home/benh/linux-powerpc-test/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h: In =
function =E2=80=98switch_mm=E2=80=99:
/home/benh/linux-powerpc-test/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h:34: =
error: implicit declaration of function =E2=80=98mm_cpumask=E2=80=99
/home/benh/linux-powerpc-test/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h:34: =
warning: passing argument 2 of =E2=80=98cpumask_set_cpu=E2=80=99 makes poin= ter from integer without a cast Hmm, I think you need to pull from Linus? He only added the accessor in "45e575ab (Rusty Russell 2009-03-12 14:35:44 -0600 281)"; you can't get struct mm_struct without seeing mm_cpumask. Thanks, Rusty.