Grant Likely wrote:
2009/3/31 Wolfram Sang [off-list ref]:
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
-
- mpc_i2c_setclock(i2c);
+
+ if (set_clock)
+ mpc_i2c_setclock(i2c);
Can't we drop 'set_clock' with something like this here?
+ if (!of_get_property(op->node, "fsl,preserve-clocking", NULL)) {
+
+ if (of_get_property(op->node, "dfsrr", NULL))
+ i2c->flags |= FSL_I2C_DEV_SEPARATE_DFSRR;
+
+ if (of_device_is_compatible(op->node, "fsl,mpc5200-i2c") ||
+ of_device_is_compatible(op->node, "mpc5200-i2c"))
+ i2c->flags |= FSL_I2C_DEV_CLOCK_5200;
+
+ mpc_i2c_setclock(i2c);
+ }
No, because the I2C registers are not yet mapped.
Sorry, I used misleading words :) With 'here' I meant 'at this
position', i.e. insert my above block where mpc_i2c_setclock was used
anyway.
I agree. The extra flag makes the flow more complex. The code block
should be moved down.
OK, I just resent the patch standalone also including documentation. I
think it can go in immediately without waiting for the full clock
setting patch.
Wolfgang.