Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86-64: seccomp: fix 32/64 syscall hole

And I guess the seccomp interaction means that this is potentially a 
2.6.29 thing. Not that I know whether anybody actually _uses_ seccomp. It 
does seem to be enabled in at least Fedora kernels, but it might not be 
used anywhere.

I have no idea who uses it.  I just assume that anyone who is using it
might be expecting it to be reliable for security purposes as advertised.


Thanks,
Roland