Re: Lock-up on PPC64
From: Geoff Levand <hidden>
Date: 2009-02-23 16:52:46
Also in:
lkml
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2008-12-25 · Lock-up on PPC64 · <hidden>
From: Geoff Levand <hidden>
Date: 2009-02-23 16:52:46
Also in:
lkml
On 01/05/2009 07:46 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Sunday 28 December 2008, malc wrote:quoted
Now to the Christmas cheer, i've tried v2.6.28 and couldn't help but notice that the problem is gone, bisecting v2.6.27 (which funnily i had to mark good) to v2.6.28 (which has to be marked bad) wasn't fun but eventually converged at ab598b6680f1e74c267d1547ee352f3e1e530f89 commit ab598b6680f1e74c267d1547ee352f3e1e530f89 Author: Paul Mackerras [off-list ref] Date: Sun Nov 30 11:49:45 2008 +0000 powerpc: Fix system calls on Cell entered with XER.SO=1 Now the lock-up is gone, however the code never exercises the path taken during the lock-up so i guess it, at least, deserves a better look by PPC64 care takers.Yes, this change was suspected to help with Mono as well, not just Java, because both of them use their own syscall path rather than going through glibc. The reason why you see the lock-up in a different place is because the bug manifested in getting incorrect syscall return codes, which probably made mono go into a normally unused error handling case.
Just FYI, I looked into a problem of Mono that was reported during its build. During the build Mono itself is used, and it failed due to lack of memory. Mono kept using more and more memory until all was consumed. I didn't look at why, I just saw it with the Gnome system monitor. -Geoff