Re: Please pull from 'next' branch (2.6.29)

On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 15:17 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:

On Jan 13, 2009, at 2:59 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

quoted

On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 09:21 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:

quoted

Please pull from 'next' branch of

(this is my last pull request of 'next' for 2.6.29.  I would like  
to see
the 'powerpc: Unify opcode definitions and support' patch go in but  
leave
that for you to pull in directly).

This is really very very very late for these changes, most of them
aren't bug fixes at all...

True.

quoted

quoted

Anton Vorontsov (4):
     powerpc/fsl_pci: Add MPC83xx PCI-E controller RC mode support
     powerpc/83xx: Add PCI-E support for all MPC83xx boards with  
PCI-E

Would like to see this feature added into .29

Can you either rebase with just that (and bug fixes) ? Or stick that in
another branch ?

quoted

quoted

     powerpc/83xx: Make serial ports work on MPC8315E-RDB w/ FSL U- 
Boots

A sort of bug fix.

Ok.

quoted

quoted

     powerpc/83xx: Move mcu_mpc8349emitx driver out of drivers/i2c/ 
chips/

At Jean's request to move i2c clients out of drivers/i2c.

Ok.

quoted

quoted

Kumar Gala (2):
     powerpc/fsl-booke: Cleanup init/exception setup to be runtime
     powerpc/e500mc: Doorbells need to be taken w/exceptions disabled

can wait for .30

Isn't the second one a clear bug fix ?

quoted

quoted

Trent Piepho (3):
     powerpc/fsl-booke: Remove code duplication in lowmem mapping
     powerpc/fsl-booke: Allow larger CAM sizes than 256 MB
     powerpc/fsl-booke: Make CAM entries used for lowmem configurable

Posted we'll before.. finally got around to reviewing them.. but can  
wait for .30

So the real question I have is when does your next branch start  
queuing up changes for .30?

Soon :-)

I can completely live w/these not going into .29 if they can go into  
your next branch for .30

Cheers,
Ben.