Re: Status of fsl booke TLB and ATMU patches
From: Kumar Gala <hidden>
Date: 2009-01-03 19:32:57
On Jan 2, 2009, at 11:30 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 16:18 -0800, Trent Piepho wrote:quoted
2.6.28 is out, can my existing patches be accepted?It's all FSL stuff and thus in Kumar's hands. I think there's a pending pull request from him tho, thus maybe they are in there already :-) I've just officially taken over so I'll scrub patchwork and outstanding sub maintainer pull requests if any early next week. Cheers, Ben.
Neither of these patch sets are in my pull request. The PCI ones should be ok, but I need to review. The TLB ones I'm still a bit concerned about their impact on the KVM fsl-booke port.
quoted
[2/2] POWERPC/fsl-pci: Set relaxed ordering on prefetchable ranges http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/14546/ [1/2] POWERPC/fsl-pci: Better ATMU setup http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/14544/ [5/5] powerpc: booke: Allow larger CAM sizes than 256 MB http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/12885/ [4/5] powerpc: booke: Make CAM entries used for lowmem configurable http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/12884/ [3/5] powerpc: booke: Remove code duplication in lowmem mapping http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/12883/ [2/5] powerpc: booke: Remove num_tlbcam_entries http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/12882/ [1/5] powerpc: booke: Don't hard-code size of struct tlbcam http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/12881/
- k