On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 05:47:14PM +0100, Eric Sesterhenn wrote:
* Jörn Engel (joern@logfs.org) wrote:
quoted
On Fri, 16 January 2009 16:07:00 -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
quoted
Sounds like a plan to me, except maybe zlib_inflate_unsafe() and a
comment above the wrapper saying what/why is going on?
Eric, will you do the honors? Since you did all the hard work before,
you derserve the fame as well. :)
Since I am not sure either about xtensa I added chris to the cc list.
How about we just change all callers from arch/*/boot to use the _unsafe
version? Then..
+/*
+ These two wrappers decide wheter strm->next_out gets checked for NULL.
+ The zlib_inflate_unsafe() version got added because the PPC zImage
+ gets extracted to memory address 0 and therefore
+ we avoid this check for zlib_inflate_unsafe()
These two wrappers decide wheter strm->next_out gets checked for NULL.
The zlib_inflate_unsafe() version is primarily used in the pre-Linux
'boot' directory code to allow for extraction to memory address 0 and
therefore we avoid this check.
--
Tom Rini