Re: [PATCH] kexec memory ranges dynamic allocation
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Date: 2008-11-02 23:41:14
Also in:
kexec
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Date: 2008-11-02 23:41:14
Also in:
kexec
On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 11:43:15AM +0300, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
2008/11/1 Simon Horman [off-list ref]quoted
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 09:53:23AM +0300, Maxim Uvarov wrote:quoted
2008/10/31 Simon Horman [off-list ref]quoted
Hi, Could someone please comment on the satus of this patch?Hello, Simon I can not reproduce error which you wrote before on my target. So it isaquoted
little bit difficult to say what was wrong exactly.Hi, the version of the patch below (which I think is the latest) compiles fine for me. I wanted to confirm that you and Chandru are happy for it to be merged. If so, could you please provide a short descripton for the change-log and a Signed-off-by line.Patch looks good. Description is: Do not count max_memory_range for allocation. Increase allocation buffers when it is needed. This actually allows us to avoid a lot of troubles with various device-tree files. Signed-off-by: Maxim Uvarov <redacted>
Thanks, applied. -- Simon Horman VA Linux Systems Japan K.K., Sydney, Australia Satellite Office H: www.vergenet.net/~horms/ W: www.valinux.co.jp/en