Thread (8 messages) 8 messages, 2 authors, 2008-11-02

Re: [PATCH] kexec memory ranges dynamic allocation

From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Date: 2008-11-02 23:41:14
Also in: kexec

On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 11:43:15AM +0300, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
2008/11/1 Simon Horman [off-list ref]
quoted
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 09:53:23AM +0300, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
quoted
2008/10/31 Simon Horman [off-list ref]
quoted
Hi,

Could someone please comment on the satus of this patch?
Hello,  Simon

I can not reproduce  error which you wrote before on my target. So it is
a
quoted
little bit
difficult to say what  was wrong exactly.
Hi,

the version of the patch below (which I think is the latest)
compiles fine for me. I wanted to confirm that you
and Chandru are happy for it to be merged.

If so, could you please provide a short descripton for the change-log
and a Signed-off-by line.
Patch looks good.

Description is:
   Do not count  max_memory_range for allocation. Increase allocation
buffers
   when it is needed. This actually allows us to avoid a lot of troubles
with
   various device-tree files.

Signed-off-by: Maxim Uvarov <redacted>
Thanks, applied.

-- 
Simon Horman
  VA Linux Systems Japan K.K., Sydney, Australia Satellite Office
  H: www.vergenet.net/~horms/             W: www.valinux.co.jp/en
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help