Re: relocatable kernel vs. yaboot
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Date: 2008-10-30 21:37:35
Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 836 bytes
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Date: 2008-10-30 21:37:35
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 08:33 +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Yes, yaboot needs to be fixed.
Yeah, my bad, I was offline when writing this and only checked later to find you'd already discussed that. Sorry.
quoted
Modifying the vmlinux in the same way as above makes yaboot take it, and I can easily make this part of my installation procedure, but I wonder if it should be done automatically? Or maybe only documented in the Kconfig help text? I probably wouldn't have enabled it and then wondered why it doesn't work if it had warned me about breaking yaboot ;)Yes, we could add something to the help text. Until yaboot gets fixed, you could either boot the zImage with yaboot or use that iseries hack.
I can send a patch if you want?
Why did you enable it? Just to try it out? The main reason for having it turned on is if you want to have a single kernel image that can be used both as a normal kernel and a kdump kernel.
Yeah, no particular reason, just enabled it on a whim when oldconfig asked. johannes