Scott Wood writes:
I'm not sure why we don't use dcbt in memcpy(), as it's just ignored if
the memory is cache-inhibited.
Both dcbt and dcbz tend to slow things down if the relevant block is
already in the cache. Since the kernel memcpy is mostly used for
copies that are only 1 or a small number of cache lines long, it's not
clear that the benefit of dcbt and/or dcbz would outweigh the cost.
And anyway, I have yet to be convinced that optimizing memcpy would
provide a measureable benefit.
Paul.