RE: Disabling L1 D-cache and side effects
From: Tirumala Reddy Marri <hidden>
Date: 2008-09-30 16:57:11
=20 Ben, Thanks for the response. I am wondering how user space would get affected by absence of L1 Dcache. Thanks, Marri -----Original Message----- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt [mailto:benh@kernel.crashing.org]=20 Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 12:16 AM To: Tirumala Reddy Marri Cc: Olof Johansson; linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: RE: Disabling L1 D-cache and side effects On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 14:38 -0700, Tirumala Reddy Marri wrote:
Could you please point me to the which does the Critical error=20 (Machine Check) recovery. BTW I am successful booting the Linux until rootfs is
being mounted. It fails to mount the Linux saying that blocks are=20 corrupted in file system. I had to modify lots of initial bring up=20 code to disable D-cache and make sure all TLB's are cache inhibited.=20 Ando also made sure none of the misc_32.S , entry_32.S and head.S=20 makes any references to d-cache.
Why the heck are you doing that btw ? AFAIK, as Olof says, things like atomic operations will not work, dcbz neither etc... it's likely that even if you manage to plaster around all of this in the kernel, whatever userspace code you'll try to run in userspace will blow up too... Cheers, Ben.