Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 2 authors, 2008-08-21

Re: [PATCH 1/3]: sparc: Implement irq_of_parse_and_map() and irq_dispose_mapping().

flat view

From: Anton Vorontsov <hidden>
Date: 2008-08-21 21:56:13
Also in: sparclinux

On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 12:10:17AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
sparc: Implement irq_of_parse_and_map() and irq_dispose_mapping().

This allows more OF layer code to be shared between powerpc and
sparc.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
---
 arch/sparc/include/asm/prom.h   |    8 ++++++++
 arch/sparc/kernel/of_device.c   |   11 +++++++++++
 arch/sparc64/kernel/of_device.c |   11 +++++++++++
 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/prom.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/prom.h
index b5efc4d..58b85fa 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/prom.h
+++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/prom.h
@@ -96,6 +96,14 @@ static inline void of_node_put(struct device_node *node)
 {
 }
 
+/* These routines are here to provide compatibility with how powerpc
+ * handles IRQ mapping for OF device nodes.  We precompute and permanently
+ * register them in the of_device objects, whereas powerpc computes them
+ * on request.
+ */
+extern int irq_of_parse_and_map(struct device_node *node, int index);
On powerpc irq_of_parse_and_map() returns unsigned type.
+#define irq_dispose_mapping(irq) do { } while (0)
I'd rather write it as a static inline function, for type checking,
plus, I think with this macros gcc may generate warnings about
defined but unused variables.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+
 /*
  * NB:  This is here while we transition from using asm/prom.h
  * to linux/of.h
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/of_device.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/of_device.c
index cc4c235..56e9a71 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/of_device.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/of_device.c
@@ -29,6 +29,17 @@ struct of_device *of_find_device_by_node(struct device_node *dp)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_find_device_by_node);
 
+int irq_of_parse_and_map(struct device_node *node, int index)
+{
+	struct of_device *op = of_find_device_by_node(node);
+
+	if (!op || index >= op->num_irqs)
+		return 0xffffffff;
This is valid virq, unfortunately. There is only one invalid virq: 0.
With this most drivers will fail to identify 'there is no irq' case.
Does virq0 has special meaning on sparc?

Thanks,

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help