Re: [RFC] 4xx hardware watchpoint support
From: Kumar Gala <hidden>
Date: 2008-07-25 19:38:40
On Jul 25, 2008, at 10:23 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Jul 24, 2008, at 11:00 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:quoted
On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 13:10 -0300, Luis Machado wrote:quoted
On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 11:53 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:quoted
Shouldn't this (and other places) be: #if defined(CONFIG_44x) || defined(CONFIG_BOOKE) if you are going to exclude 40x for now? Otherwise this is still enabled on 405 and setting the wrong register. joshYes, sorry. I wasn't aware of this specific define value. It makes things easier to support 405's later. Like so?Please, next time, when you re-send a patch like that, re-include the full subject and patch description. You can add then blurbs after the --- line if you want to add things that won't make it to git. I'll deal with that specific one for now.Ben, I want to make sure this works on FSL Book-E before it gets into tree and I need to think about what SMP issues it might have. I talked to Josh about this at OLS and if you are ok I can deal with acceptance of this patch via my tree.
Josh pointed out that you went ahead and merged this. Curse you :) I've got a patch in my tree to address my initial concerns. - k