Thread (25 messages) 25 messages, 6 authors, 2008-07-25

Re: [RFC] 4xx hardware watchpoint support

From: Kumar Gala <hidden>
Date: 2008-07-25 19:38:40

On Jul 25, 2008, at 10:23 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Jul 24, 2008, at 11:00 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
quoted
On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 13:10 -0300, Luis Machado wrote:
quoted
On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 11:53 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
quoted
Shouldn't this (and other places) be:

#if defined(CONFIG_44x) || defined(CONFIG_BOOKE)

if you are going to exclude 40x for now?  Otherwise this is still
enabled on 405 and setting the wrong register.

josh
Yes, sorry. I wasn't aware of this specific define value. It makes
things easier to support 405's later.

Like so?
Please, next time, when you re-send a patch like that, re-include
the full subject and patch description. You can add then blurbs after
the --- line if you want to add things that won't make it to git.

I'll deal with that specific one for now.
Ben,  I want to make sure this works on FSL Book-E before it gets  
into tree and I need to think about what SMP issues it might have.

I talked to Josh about this at OLS and if you are ok I can deal with  
acceptance of this patch via my tree.
Josh pointed out that you went ahead and merged this.  Curse you :)

I've got a patch in my tree to address my initial concerns.

- k
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help