On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Timur Tabi [off-list ref] wrote:
Mark Brown wrote:
quoted
quoted
The PowerPC side isn't without fault too. PowerPC still doesn't have a
good way to load the fabric/machine driver.
I'm finding it difficult to square these two statements - from an ASoC
point of view the main thing this patch is doing is adding a machine
driver and that's not something that's going to go away.
Jon's concern is that there is no straightforward way to build a kernel with
multiple fabric drivers and have the right one chosen via the device tree. This
is just a limitation of the device tree model, and no one has come up with a
good solution yet.
The problem still exists in ASoC V2. However, it's not anything that ASoC
itself needs to be concerned with. It's purely a PowerPC problem.
It's purely an *OF Device Tree* problem. PowerPC isn't the only
platform using the device tree. :-)
g.
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.