On 7/7/08 4:40 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 16:31 -0700, Grant Erickson wrote:
quoted
#define RGMII_FER_GMII(idx) (0x7 << ((idx) * 4))
+#define RGMII_FER_MII(idx) (0x7 << ((idx) * 4))
Hrm... the setting of the register is exactly the same right ?
Do we -really- need that ?
Would you prefer?
+#define RGMII_FER_MII(idx) RGMII_FER_GMII(idx)
Having the "extra" mnemonic makes the code end up looking less like a typo
and more like a conscious decision: "Yes, we know MII and GMII are the same
setting, but we're being explicit about it."
-Grant