Re: New fsl device bindings file

quoted

	/* deprecated; */
	device_type =3D "i2c";

How about "deprecated but kept for compatibility with true Open=20
Firmware
implementations"?

Well, except a flat tree isn't compatible with OF at all here.
A "device_type" promises a certain interface; a flat tree doesn't
even have the "open" method.  =46rom the OF base spec:

	=93device_type=94 S

	Standard property name to specify the implemented interface.

	prop-encoded-array: Text string encoded with encode-string.

	Specifies the =93device type=94 of this package, thus implying a
	specific set of package class methods implemented by this
	package.

Seriously, you can't have a binding for "OF" and then cut out that=20
part of the
standard at a whim.

Nothing is cut out.  There never was a device binding for device_type
i2c; creating one would be a considerable effort, and since flat tree
users wouldn't use it anyway, you can't be seriously suggesting they
should do this.

It should be there (at least for those parts which are
governed by a client interface API, like display, serial etc.

Huh?  Nothing in the client interface mentions display or serial
as far as I know.

but cutting it off takes away all it's meaning,

So what?  There _is_ no "real" device interface, when a flat tree is
used.

plus Linux implementations STILL keep searching
that property along with "compatible",

That's a bug.


Segher