On Friday 27 June 2008, Scott Wood wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:36:36AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
quoted
There isn't any reason at this point that we can't build 83xx & 86xx su=
pport
quoted
in with the other 6xx based boards. =A0Twiddle the Kconfigs to allow th=
is.
=20
Likewise with 82xx -- why don't we just get rid of the "Machine type"
choice, and turn them all into bools?
I started looking for possible problems with hardcoded settings for some
of the platforms, and the only code that looked suspicious in this regard
was CPM2, but it turned out that this was all because of code built without
CONFIG_PPC_CPM_NEW_BINDING, which is practically gone in kumar's powerpc-ne=
xt
branch.
Arnd <><