On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Jon Smirl [off-list ref] wrote:
Why was the fifo struct separated from the psc struct for the 5200?
I see comments like this now:
/* On the 5200, fifo regs are immediately adjacent to the psc regs */
mps->fifo = ((void __iomem *)mps->psc) + sizeof(struct mpc52xx_psc);
Couldn't the fifo struct be a member at the end of the psc struct?
The mpc5121 uses the same PSC register structure, but the fifo regs
are no longer adjacent.
Cheers,
g.
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.