Re: "cell-index" vs. "index" vs. no index in I2C device nodes
From: Timur Tabi <hidden>
Date: 2008-06-05 15:24:40
From: Timur Tabi <hidden>
Date: 2008-06-05 15:24:40
Josh Boyer wrote:
From a device tree perspective, index and cell-index are both incorrect. The IIC macros don't share register blocks with anything, are enumerated as unique instances per macro in the device tree, and should be able to be distinguished by "regs" and/or unit address.
I think we should just expand the definition of cell-index to include standard device enumeration for when it's needed. The original definition is too limited, IMHO. -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale