Thread (74 messages) 74 messages, 12 authors, 2008-06-27

Re: "cell-index" vs. "index" vs. no index in I2C device nodes

From: Timur Tabi <hidden>
Date: 2008-06-05 15:24:40

Josh Boyer wrote:
From a device tree perspective, index and cell-index are both
incorrect.  The IIC macros don't share register blocks with anything,
are enumerated as unique instances per macro in the device tree, and
should be able to be distinguished by "regs" and/or unit address.
I think we should just expand the definition of cell-index to include standard
device enumeration for when it's needed.  The original definition is too
limited, IMHO.

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help