On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Stephen Neuendorffer
[off-list ref] wrote:

ePAPR drafts propose 'simple-bus' as a generic compatibility type for
 busses which cannot be probed for devices.  In addition, the Xilinx
 versions of these IPs seem to be proliferating.  Hence, in the future
 let's prefer to use the standard names.  I've left the old names in
 for short term backward compatibility for existing device trees.

 Signed-off-by: Stephen Neuendorffer [off-list ref]

Acked-by: Grant Likely <redacted>

I'll queue this up for .27

Cheers,
g.

 ---
  arch/powerpc/platforms/40x/virtex.c |    1 +
  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

 diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/40x/virtex.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/40x/virtex.c
 index 6c72994..b1ab7b8 100644
 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/40x/virtex.c
 +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/40x/virtex.c
 @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
  #include <asm/xilinx_intc.h>

  static struct of_device_id xilinx_of_bus_ids[] __initdata = {
 +       { .compatible = "simple-bus", },
        { .compatible = "xlnx,plb-v46-1.00.a", },
        { .compatible = "xlnx,plb-v46-1.02.a", },
        { .compatible = "xlnx,plb-v34-1.01.a", },
 --
 1.5.3.4

-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.