On Thu, 01 May 2008 09:53:22 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt [off-list ref] wrote:

On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 18:45 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:

quoted

quoted

thanks.  Will take a look.  I just plan on overloading MMUCR with

MAS0.

Erg.  Why?  Please don't do that.  This is common code and MAS0
doesn't
make much sense on 4xx.  It'll be confusing to anyone that isn't aware
of this change.

Nah, he meant using the slot for MAS0 in the exception frame structure
as to not have to define two different structures I suppose...

Ah, ok.  Sorry, still playing catch up on email.  I thought we were
talking about a #define.

josh