Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2008-04-17

Re: [PATCH] x86: fix find_next_bit breakage on ppc and powerpc

From: Alexander van Heukelum <hidden>
Date: 2008-04-17 09:04:50
Also in: lkml

On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 08:55:12 +1000, "Paul Mackerras" [off-list ref]
said:
Ingo Molnar writes:
quoted
* Alexander van Heukelum [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Powerpc (and ppc) have their have some code in their bitops.h which 
used to be exacly the same as asm-generic/bitops/find.h. Include this 
header instead.

This should also fix the compile problems due to the generic 
find_next_bit changes. Those were fixed by Thomas Gleixner in 
asm-generic/bitops/find.h earlier.

Signed-off-by: Alexander van Heukelum <redacted>
thanks, applied. I dropped:
Why are powerpc (and ppc) patches
- not being sent to the powerpc maintainer (me)
- not being cc'd to the linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org list
- ending up going through the x86 tree?
Hello,

My apologies for that. The patches that are now in x86#testing were
needed because of changes I introduced. Thomas Gleixner found a
problem with the patches that caused compile problems for basically
all archs with GENERIC_FIND_NEXT_BIT=y, and his fix was to change
asm-generic/bitops/find.h. However, ppc and powerpc did things
differently... (x86 too, but they have special permissions ;) )

(Better late than never) Please consider applying the patch in
        http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/16/107
as:

[PATCH] powerpc: use asm-generic/bitops/find.h in bitops.h

Powerpc (and ppc) have some code in their bitops.h that is
exacly the same as asm-generic/bitops/find.h. Include this
header instead of the private implementation.
How come patches to unify x86_32 and x86_64 bitops need to end up
touching powerpc?
This was not a pure unification. Originally I wanted to convert
both x86_64 and i386 to the existing generic bitops. Andi Kleen,
however, objected because x86_64 would than lose a certain
optimization for small bitmaps. I moved this optimization to
the generic code, and broke non-x86. Everyone except ppc/powerpc
was fixed by Thomas Gleixner (in a generic header file).
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/16/107 just changes ppc/powerpc in
such a way that Thomas' fix works there too.

Greetings,
    Alexander
Paul.
-- 
  Alexander van Heukelum
  heukelum@fastmail.fm

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - The professional email service
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help