Re: dtc: Simplify error handling for unparseable input
flat view
From: David Gibson <hidden>
Date: 2008-03-25 21:21:27
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 09:36:19AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 12:28:05PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:quoted
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:36:41PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:quoted
If you remove this, there'll be no way to indicate semantic errors other than die() (the NULL approaches are no good, since they inhibit recovery), which is suboptimal if the error is not immediately fatal.But everything is immediately fatal. When we have a *real* example of something that's not, we can restore an error code.Failed binary includes are not immediately fatal.
And is there any advantage to having them not immediately fatal? -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson