Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add local bus device nodes to MPC837xMDS device trees.

On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 04:39:30AM +0100, Segher Boessenkool wrote:

quoted

This isn't a problem with this device tree, but it's probably time we
started establishing some conventional generic names for nand flash
and board-control devices.

So, to start the ball rolling, I've seen several names for nand flash
nodes, I'd suggest we standardise on "nand-flash".

What's wrong with the already well-established generic name "flash"?

I was concerned that using "flash" for both NOR flash (which it
already is) and NAND flash might be unwise.  I am quite open to being
convinced otherwise, though.

quoted

I've seen several variants for board control devices (cpld, bcsr,
fpga, etc.) I suggest we standardise on "board-control"

Fine with me, but it's very vague (hard to avoid though).

Yes.

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson