Re: [PATCH 2/11] celleb: move the base part for celleb support
flat view
From: Ishizaki Kou <hidden>
Date: 2008-03-07 07:04:50
Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wednesday 05 March 2008, Ishizaki Kou wrote:quoted
This patch moves the base code for celleb support into platforms/cell/. All files in this patch are used by celleb-beat and celleb-native commonly.Moving around the files this way is good, butquoted
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/Makefile 2008-03-04 14:00:28.000000000 +0900@@ -26,3 +26,20 @@ ? spufs/ obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_MSI) += axon_msi.o + + +# celleb stuff +ifeq ($(CONFIG_PPC_CELLEB),y) +obj-y += celleb_setup.o \ + celleb_pci.o celleb_scc_epci.o \ + celleb_scc_pciex.o \ + celleb_scc_uhc.o \ + beat.o beat_htab.o beat_hvCall.o \ + beat_interrupt.o beat_iommu.o \ + io-workarounds.o spider-pci.o + +obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += beat_smp.o +obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_UDBG_BEAT) += beat_udbg.o +obj-$(CONFIG_SERIAL_TXX9) += celleb_scc_sio.o +obj-$(CONFIG_SPU_BASE) += beat_spu_priv1.o +endifThis looks like you are referencing files in the Makefile that are moved in the later patches. In order to make the git-bisect work correctly on the kernel after the patches are applied, I'd suggest either moving all files at once, or to modify the Makefile in every step of the way so that the kernel still builds.
Thanks for your advice. I'll split changing the Makefile because the moving patches is too large to be one patch. Best regards, Kou Ishizaki