[PATCH] [POWERPC] mpc5200: fix incorrect compatible string for the mdio node
From: Grant Likely <hidden>
Date: 2008-03-22 03:25:34
Started by Grant Likely on Mar 22, 2008 · 3 messages from 2 authors · Last reply Mar 24, 2008
open the first message on its own page
From: Grant Likely <hidden>
Date: 2008-03-22 03:25:34
The MDIO node in the lite5200b.dts file needs to also claim compatibility
with the older mpc5200 chip.
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <redacted>
---
Paul, this one should also go in for .26
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/lite5200b.dts | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/lite5200b.dts b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/lite5200b.dts
index 30eaeab..001c955 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/lite5200b.dts
+++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/lite5200b.dts@@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ mdio@3000 { #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <0>; - compatible = "fsl,mpc5200b-mdio"; + compatible = "fsl,mpc5200b-mdio", "fsl,mpc5200-mdio"; reg = <0x3000 0x400>; // fec range, since we need to setup fec interrupts interrupts = <2 5 0>; // these are for "mii command finished", not link changes & co. interrupt-parent = <&mpc5200_pic>;
--
1.5.4.3
From: Paul Mackerras <hidden>
Date: 2008-03-24 07:24:59
Grant Likely writes:
The MDIO node in the lite5200b.dts file needs to also claim compatibility with the older mpc5200 chip. Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <redacted> --- Paul, this one should also go in for .26
OK, I'll put it in the powerpc-next branch. Or did you mean it should
go in .25?
Paul.
From: Grant Likely <hidden>
Date: 2008-03-24 13:34:44
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 1:24 AM, Paul Mackerras [off-list ref] wrote:
Grant Likely writes: > The MDIO node in the lite5200b.dts file needs to also claim compatibility > with the older mpc5200 chip. > > Signed-off-by: Grant Likely [off-list ref] > --- > Paul, this one should also go in for .26 OK, I'll put it in the powerpc-next branch. Or did you mean it should go in .25?
er, oops. Yes, I really would like this one to go in for .25 Thanks, g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.