Thread (5 messages) flat view 5 messages, 2 authors, 2008-02-20

Re: [PATCH] [LMB]: Fix lmb_add_region if region should be added at the head

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2008-02-20 04:44:57
Also in: lkml, sparclinux

From: Kumar Gala <redacted>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:27:48 -0600 (CST)
We introduced a bug in fixing lmb_add_region to handle an initial
region being non-zero.  Before that fix it was impossible to insert
a region at the head of the list since the first region always started
at zero.

Now that its possible for the first region to be non-zero we need to
check to see if the new region should be added at the head and if so
actually add it.

Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <redacted>
 ...
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -184,6 +184,11 @@ static long __init lmb_add_region(struct lmb_region *rgn, u64 base, u64 size)
 			break;
 		}
 	}
+
+	if (base < rgn->region[0].base) {
+		rgn->region[0].base = base;
+		rgn->region[0].size = size;
+	}
 	rgn->cnt++;

 	return 0;
Are you sure this is sufficient?

It seems to me, to handle this properly, you'll need to handle
the case where the lower addressed entry you are inserting is
not contiguous with the existing entry 0.

Therefore, you need to move all existing entries up a slot,
then you can set the 0 entry to 'base' and 'size'.

What do you think?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help