Re: ppc32: Weird process scheduling behaviour with 2.6.24-rc
From: Ingo Molnar <hidden>
Date: 2008-01-28 13:08:32
From: Ingo Molnar <hidden>
Date: 2008-01-28 13:08:32
* Peter Zijlstra [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
i think it would be OK to do half of this: make it easier to preempt a +nice task. Michel, do you really need the -nice portion as well? It's not a problem to super-preempt positively reniced tasks, but it can be quite annoying if negatively reniced tasks have super-slices.This should do that (unless I need a stronger cup of tea).
cool - thanks Peter. Michel, could you check Peter's patch, does it resolve all the interactivity problems you've been seeing? Ingo