On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 12:25:32PM -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:

On 12/19/07, Timur Tabi [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

+               ssi@16000 {
+                       compatible = "fsl,ssi";
+                       cell-index = <0>;
+                       reg = <16000 100>;
+                       interrupt-parent = <&mpic>;
+                       interrupts = <3e 2>;
+                       fsl,mode = "i2s-slave";
+                       codec {
+                               compatible = "cirrus,cs4270";
+                               /* MCLK source is a stand-alone oscillator */
+                               bus-frequency = <bb8000>;
+                       };
+               };

Does this need to be bus-frequency? It's always called MCLK in all of
the literature.

In my case the MCLK comes from a chip on the i2c bus that is
programmable How would that be encoded?.

Grah!  If there's one obvious frequency for a node, it should always
be "clock-frequency".  This bus-frequency nonsense seems to be a
disease that started as a secondary frequency in Freescale CPU nodes,
and has escaped to all sorts of other places.

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson