Hi,
On Jan 23, 2008 9:52 PM, Nishanth Aravamudan [off-list ref] wrote:
On at least one of the machines in question, wasn't it the case that
node 0 had all the memory and node 1 had all the CPUs? In that case, you
would have to boot off a memoryless node? And as long as that is a
physically valid configuration, the kernel should handle it.
Agreed. Here's the patch that should fix it:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/23/332
On Jan 23, 2008 9:52 PM, Nishanth Aravamudan [off-list ref] wrote:
I bet we didn't notice this breaking because SLUB became the default and
SLAB isn't on in the test.kernel.org testing, for instance. Perhaps we
should add a second set of runs for some of the boxes there to run with
CONFIG_SLAB on?
Sure.
On Jan 23, 2008 9:52 PM, Nishanth Aravamudan [off-list ref] wrote:
I'm curious if we know, for sure, of a kernel with CONFIG_SLAB=y that
has booted all of the boxes reporting issues? That is, did they all work
with 2.6.23?
I think Mel said that their configuration did work with 2.6.23
although I also wonder how that's possible. AFAIK there has been some
changes in the page allocator that might explain this. That is, if
kmem_getpages() returned pages for memoryless node before, bootstrap
would have worked.
Pekka