On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 02:12:28PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:

I have no opinions about the config symbol names.  Among the existing
precedents for internal/descriptionless symbols I find more not using the
HAVE_ prefix than those using it.

The convention is newly established - so no suprise.

The patch versions I've sent now work
fine, fix the parallel build problem people were seeing, and AFAICT follow
the style of what's already in common use.  At this point, I think it would
be easiest just to keep them and have you send symbol-renaming patches
for any and all symbols of this sort that concern you as separate cleanups.

Would love to - but the pile of other kbuild stuff only gets bigger..

	Sam