Re: [i2c] [PATCH 0/4] Series to add device tree naming to i2c

On Sun, 2007-12-09 at 15:57 -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:

Are there technical concerns with this series? The white space can be
fixed in a few minutes.

Adding a tag to differentiate matching types has implications that are
broader than just i2c. Shouldn't we do this first with the existing
scheme and then change the tagging process with later patches?

No, we should decide on what to do with the tagging process (or not do)
first, don't you think ? (If we need a tagging process, Scott had a
concern but it might be moot, let's discuss that first).

Ben.