RE: [PATCH] Xilinx TEMAC driver

quoted

On 7/24/07, David H. Lynch Jr. [off-list ref] wrote:
=20

quoted

   Hopefully this is not too much of a mess.

quoted

Hooray!  Thanks for posting your work.  I'm keen to try this on my=20
platform.  Comments below.
=20

[snip]
Any progress on the ll_temac driver since July?  In EDK9.2, ll_temac

is really the only supported ethernet solution, apart from ethernet lite
(yuck).

If there's a PPC version in a reasonable state, i'm happy to see

what's requierd to port it across to MicroBlaze.

cheers,
John

John,

I have a ll_temac for CDMAC version that I made for >2.6.19 that used
the old wrapper from a MontaVista 2.4 kernel. It was tested (not overly
stressed) and working at speeds > 100Mb. I plan on moving it to a
unified source once I had a LocalLink TEMAC that would support my
hardware. Xilinx did not support ll_temac w/ RGMII or SGMII which are
both found on the ML410 for Gigabit.

I currently use David's driver with much success now for the plb_temac.
I have a modified version that has been mostly cleaned up. I did remove
the ll stuff since it was for a Pico(??) LocalLink TEMAC that I could
not find, and not the Xilinx LocalLink TEMAC w/ CDMAC, which is what I
was interested in. If interested, I could finish the clean-up on it and
post a patch for it (once I figure out how to actually make the patch
:P). Right now what mainly remains is finish grouping the functions for
FIFO and starting support for DMA.

-- Mike