On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 01:55:30AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:

On Oct 30, 2007, at 6:40 PM, David Gibson wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 01:14:06PM -0400, Jerry Van Baren wrote:

quoted

Jon Loeliger wrote:

quoted

So, like, the other day Kumar Gala mumbled:

quoted

Jon,

It seems like have libfdt as a unique git repo that is a  
submodule of
the things that need it (dtc, u-boot, etc.) might make some  
sense and  it
easier for the projects that need to pull it in.

Is this something you can take a look at? (or have other ideas on).

I would be fine with making libfdt a git repository separate
from the DTC repository if that makes it easier to integrate
it with other projects.

I don't think it's a good idea to make dtc and libfdt entirely
seperate repositories (again).  Being able to use both together in
their combined testsuite is very useful (libfdt is used to check trees
generated by dtc, dtc is used to generate example trees for libfdt
testing).

I'm not sure how submodules/subrepositories work so I don't know if
that makes sense.

I believe submodules will accomplish this (at least from what I can  
tell).

I'm not too keen on using a git feature that's more recent than the
git in most distros.

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson