Re: [PATCH 11/16] Use of_get_next_child() in eeh_restore_bars()
From: Michael Ellerman <hidden>
Date: 2007-10-29 03:46:13
Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 189 bytes
From: Michael Ellerman <hidden>
Date: 2007-10-29 03:46:13
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 17:29 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:54:43 +1000 (EST) Michael Ellerman [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh.c@@ -841,11 +841,8 @@ void eeh_restore_bars(struct pci_dn *pdn) if ((pdn->eeh_mode & EEH_MODE_SUPPORTED) && !IS_BRIDGE(pdn->class_code)) __restore_bars (pdn); - dn = pdn->node->child; - while (dn) { + for (dn = NULL; (dn = of_get_next_child(pdn->node, dn));)Just wondering if we need #define for_each_child_node(dn, parent) \ for (dn = of_get_next_child(parent, NULL); dn; \ dn = of_get_next_child(parent, dn))
Hmm, perhaps. I count ~30 places we could use it under arch/powerpc, and about another ~20 in drivers/. If no one objects, I guess I'll get to it, sigh ... another Yak. Should we perhaps make it for_each_child_device_node() ? Otherwise it's slightly non obvious what kind of node it's talking about, especially in driver code. cheers -- Michael Ellerman OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183) We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person