Thread (17 messages) flat view 17 messages, 6 authors, 2007-09-12

Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC] Fix interrupt routing and setup of ULI M1575 on FSL boards

From: Olof Johansson <hidden>
Date: 2007-09-11 19:35:13

On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 01:43:59PM -0500, Becky Bruce wrote:
quoted
quoted
Maybe it would make more sense for you guys to slice the platforms
differently, and have a common platform for the eval boards you have
with ULi on them instead of grouping it by core used by the processor
on the board.

(In other words, move 86xx over under 85xx, since there wouldn't be
much
left over anyway).
Moving 86xx (classic 74xx core) under 85xx (book e500 core) makes
even less sense to me.
Yeah, that makes *no* sense to me either.  It's an unfortunate  
artifact of the naming of boards to include the core name.  While the  
devices and boards may be similar, once you have bookE vs non-bookE  
cores, they become quite different.
It doesn't make sense if you move 86xx under 85xx right now, no.

What I meant (but didn't write) was more along the lines of forking off
a new platform (I don't know if you have a common code name for the SoC
side, but fsl-whatever) that contains the SoC and board support for the
parts and boards that share much (looks like the latest gen 85xx and
8641 would be candidates).

Looks like the CPM2-based stuff could be candidates for something similar
as well, but there's less activity there so there's less reason to rework
those, I suppose.

Of course, down the road I'm sure there'll be a part that contains 75%
of the current SoC, plus something new. And the next gen after that only
contains the 25% non-shared plus 75% brand new stuff and it all falls
apart. Not knowing your roadmap I have a hard time judging if that's
likely though. :-)


-Olof
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help