Re: RFC: issues concerning the next NAPI interface
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2007-08-27 20:37:49
Also in:
lkml, netdev
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2007-08-27 20:37:49
Also in:
lkml, netdev
From: Jan-Bernd Themann <redacted> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:47:01 +0200
So the question is simply: Do we want drivers that need (benefit from) a timer based polling support to implement their own timers each, or should there be a generic support?
I'm trying to figure out how an hrtimer implementation would even work. Would you start the timer from the chip interrupt handler? If so, that's taking two steps backwards as you've already taken all of the overhead of running the interrupt handler.