Thread (18 messages) flat view 18 messages, 5 authors, 2007-08-07

Re: [PATCH 2.6.22.y] ieee1394: revert "sbp2: enforce 32bit DMA mapping"

From: Robert Hancock <hidden>
Date: 2007-08-06 22:35:46
Also in: lkml

Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 16:25 -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
quoted
quoted
Anyway.  For now I will simply go with what 2.6.23-rc has and what
2.6.21 had:  No dma_set_mask anywhere in the 1394 subsystem.  We can
revisit this whenever an actual need arises.
Not sure this is a very good idea. This seems rather likely to fail on
x86_64 machines with >4GB of RAM for example.. 
Would it ? Isn't the default DMA mask for PCI devices set to 32 bits
anyway ? In which case, swiotlb will take care of the matter.

Cheers,
Ben.
Hmm, that's true, yes. Suppose it shouldn't be a problem then.

I would agree, though, that sbp2 isn't really the place for setting 
this, since the DMA mask is presently a property of the device, not of 
the user..

-- 
Robert Hancock      Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@nospamshaw.ca
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help