On Fri, 03 Aug 2007 21:30:57 +0400
Sergei Shtylyov [off-list ref] wrote:
Josh Boyer wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
on 40x to match the behavior 44x currently has.
quoted
quoted
quoted
Why bother doing this?! This will only warrant you imprecise decrementer
interrupts while it should be interrupting at the precise period currently (if
you load PIT once)...
quoted
quoted
I.e. the error will only accumulate. NAK.
quoted
What error exactly? I'm not following you there. If there really is
I was assuming that the decrementer is in auto-reload mode. Brain fade. :-<
Heh, ok. Glad I wasn't completely lost there :).
josh