Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 2007-07-25

Re: pte_offset_map for ppc assumes HIGHPTE

From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: 2007-07-25 23:10:38
Also in: linux-mm, lkml

On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 17:16 -0500, Satya wrote:
hello,
The implementation of pte_offset_map() for ppc assumes that PTEs are
kept in highmem (CONFIG_HIGHPTE). There is only one implmentation of
pte_offset_map() as follows (include/asm-ppc/pgtable.h):

#define pte_offset_map(dir, addr)               \
         ((pte_t *) kmap_atomic(pmd_page(*(dir)), KM_PTE0) + pte_index(addr))

Shouldn't this be made conditional according to CONFIG_HIGHPTE is
defined or not (as implemented in include/asm-i386/pgtable.h) ?

the same goes for pte_offset_map_nested and the corresponding unmap functions.
Do we have CONFIG_HIGHMEM without CONFIG_HIGHPTE ? If yes, then indeed,
we should change that. Though I'm not sure I see the point of splitting
those 2 options.

Ben.
 
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help