Re: pte_offset_map for ppc assumes HIGHPTE
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: 2007-07-25 23:10:38
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: 2007-07-25 23:10:38
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 17:16 -0500, Satya wrote:
hello,
The implementation of pte_offset_map() for ppc assumes that PTEs are
kept in highmem (CONFIG_HIGHPTE). There is only one implmentation of
pte_offset_map() as follows (include/asm-ppc/pgtable.h):
#define pte_offset_map(dir, addr) \
((pte_t *) kmap_atomic(pmd_page(*(dir)), KM_PTE0) + pte_index(addr))
Shouldn't this be made conditional according to CONFIG_HIGHPTE is
defined or not (as implemented in include/asm-i386/pgtable.h) ?
the same goes for pte_offset_map_nested and the corresponding unmap functions.Do we have CONFIG_HIGHMEM without CONFIG_HIGHPTE ? If yes, then indeed, we should change that. Though I'm not sure I see the point of splitting those 2 options. Ben.