Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 6 authors, 2007-07-13

Re: idr_get_new_above() limitation?

From: Jim Houston <hidden>
Date: 2007-07-03 00:45:48
Also in: lkml

On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 19:19 +0200, Hoang-Nam Nguyen wrote:
i=3fffffff token=3fffffff t=000000003fffffff
i=40000000 token=40000000 t=0000000000000000
Invalid object 0000000000000000. Expected 40000000

That means token 0x40000000 seems to be the "upper boundary" of idr_find().
However the behaviour is not consistent in that it was returned by
idr_get_new_above().
Hi Nam,

Yes this is a bug.  Thanks for the great test module.

The problem is in idr_get_new_above_int() in the loop which
adds new layers to the top of the radix tree.  It is failing
the "layers < (MAX_LEVEL - 1)" test.  It doesn't allocate the
new layer but still calls sub_alloc() which relies on having
the new layer properly constructed.  I believe that it is
allocating the slot which corresponds to id = 0.

I believe this is an off by one error in calculating the
MAX_LEVEL value.  I will do a more careful review and post 
a fix in the next day or so.  I have been in Ottawa for OLS.
I'm flying home tomorrow.

Jim Houston - Concurrent Computer Corp.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help