Re: MPC82xx ADS SCC ports initialisation
From: Laurent Pinchart <hidden>
Date: 2007-07-11 13:14:04
Hi Vitaly, On Wednesday 11 July 2007 12:34, Vitaly Bordug wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:11:18 +0200 Laurent Pinchart wrote:quoted
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 20:11, Scott Wood wrote:quoted
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 04:19:51PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:quoted
clrbits32(&immap->im_cpmux.cmx_scr, (0x00000007 << (4 - data->clk_tx))); clrbits32(&immap->im_cpmux.cmx_scr, (0x00000038 << (4 - data->clk_rx))); setbits32(&immap->im_cpmux.cmx_scr, ((data->clk_tx - 1) << (4 - data->clk_tx))); setbits32(&immap->im_cpmux.cmx_scr, ((data->clk_rx - 1) << (4 - data->clk_rx))); The shift right-hand operand doesn't seem to be correct. Could anyone confirm this ?You are correct; it's broken.That code should be replaced with calls to cpm2_clk_setup (arch/powerpc/sysdev/cpm2_common.c). cpm2_clk_setup currently supports FCC clock setup only, but I've got a patch to add SCC clock setup support. Should I send it ?If you have functional approach, please feel free to send it...
I haven't been able to test the patch, as I have no ADS hardware to test it on. My MPC82xx board is far from being ported to the powerpc architecture. I'll send the patch anyway. Could you evaluate it ?
quoted
quoted
quoted
If my assumption is right, could anyone tell me if the MPC82xx processors are actually supported by the powerpc architecture, or if the MPC82xx ADS code is just a non-functional work in progress.once my last changes were committed, 82xx was supported and worked fine. Pretty long time I had no access to the hardware, hence some minor things might require catch-up.
The above code might have been worked by sheer luck though.
quoted
quoted
I have a bunch of 8xx/82xx changes pending; I hope to get them cleaned up before the merge window ends.Since I'm the only person covering 8xx/82xx for a while, I definitely want to look at those changes...quoted
That would be nice. I'll wait for your changes to continue my ppc -> powerpc port.quoted
quoted
I also noticed that U-Boot doesn't have flatten device tree support for the MPC82xx family.At the moment, I have a patch to add such a thing, but no ability to validate it still works. If you guys will assist a little, I'll go ahead and submit it to the u-boot list.
I'm ready to help, but I'd like to port my board to the powerpc architecture first. FDT support in U-Boot is pretty useless with the ppc architecture.
quoted
quoted
No, but cuImage for 82xx is on its way.Ok, nice to know. Adding FDT support to U-Boot for the MPC82xx family will be on my todo-list once I get Linux working with cuImage.
Laurent Pinchart