Re: Virtex 4 Avnet Mini-Module Networking.

Mohammad Sadegh Sadri wrote:

very interesting

the provided xps project from xapp941 results 230Mbits but your custome system is 83.0Mbits, yes?

yes

just, are you sure the ppc core has the same core clock frequency in both designs? I mean may be the xapp941 is running at 300MHz but yours at 100MHz. 

both run at 300MHz

And what about a custom system with 9.1SP2? does that gives the same performance?

haven't tried this yet

Finally If possible please release the test results for TCP streams. ( 9.1 no SP and 9.1 SP2 )

The TEMAC driver is from EDK 9.1.02 (IOW, SP2).

bitstream made by myself with EDK 9.1.00:
=========================================

root@192.168.119.11:~/netperf-2.4.1/src# ./netperf -l 30 -H 192.168.119.1 -i 10, 2 -I 99,10 -t TCP_STREAM -- -m 32768 -s 262144
TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 192.168.119.1 (192.168.119.1) port 0 AF_INET : ±5.0% @ 99% conf.
Recv   Send    Send
Socket Socket  Message  Elapsed
Size   Size    Size     Time     Throughput
bytes  bytes   bytes    secs.    10^6bits/sec

  87380 217088  32768    30.00      41.66

bitstream from XAPP941:
=======================

root@192.168.119.11:~/netperf-2.4.1/src# ./netperf -l 30 -H 192.168.119.1 -i 10, 2 -I 99,10 -t TCP_STREAM -- -m 32768 -s 262144
TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 192.168.119.1 (192.168.119.1) port 0 AF_INET : ±5.0% @ 99% conf.
Recv   Send    Send
Socket Socket  Message  Elapsed
Size   Size    Size     Time     Throughput
bytes  bytes   bytes    secs.    10^6bits/sec

  87380 217088  32768    30.00     111.86

And I didn't test ML405 receive performance.

Thanks,
Andrei

thanks



----------------------------------------

quoted

Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 18:53:49 +0400
From: akonovalov@ru.mvista.com
To: mamsadegh@hotmail.com
CC: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org; kashiwagi@co-nss.co.jp; glenn.g.hart@us.westinghouse.com
Subject: Re: Virtex 4 Avnet Mini-Module Networking.

Mohammad Sadegh Sadri wrote:

quoted

I'm wondering where are the original developers of TEMAC driver these days, I have not seen any posts from any of andrei
nor grant in the recent weeks. may be they are involved in other projects.

As for me - no, not until the end of this week..

I am puzzled with the following:

I've got ML405 recently. There is a prebuilt bitstream with TEMAC in SGDMA mode for this board made by Xilinx (XAPP941).
With the TEMAC driver from EDK 9.1SP2 and the XAPP941 bitstream I've got (no jumbo frames):

   XTemac: using sgDMA mode.
   XTemac: using TxDRE mode
   XTemac: using RxDRE mode
   XTemac: buffer descriptor size: 32768 (0x8000)
   XTemac: (buffer_descriptor_init) phy: 0x3cf8000, virt: 0xff100000, size: 0x8000
   eth%d: XTemac: PHY detected at address 7.
   eth0: Xilinx TEMAC #0 at 0x80000000 mapped to 0xC5060000, irq=0
   eth0: XTemac id 1.0f, block id 5, type 8

   eth0: XTemac: Options: 0xb8f2
   eth0: XTemac: We renegotiated the speed to: 1000
   eth0: XTemac: speed set to 1000Mb/s
   eth0: XTemac: Send Threshold = 16, Receive Threshold = 2
   eth0: XTemac: Send Wait bound = 1, Receive Wait bound = 1

   root@192.168.119.11:~/netperf-2.4.1/src# ./netperf -l 30 -H 192.168.119.1 -i 10,
   2 -I 99,10 -t UDP_STREAM -- -m 32768 -s 262144
   UDP UNIDIRECTIONAL SEND TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 192.168.11
   9.1 (192.168.119.1) port 0 AF_INET : ±5.0% @ 99% conf.
   Socket  Message  Elapsed      Messages
   Size    Size     Time         Okay Errors   Throughput
   bytes   bytes    secs            #      #   10^6bits/sec

   217088   32768   30.00       26391      0     230.60
   107520           30.00       26377            230.48

Not that bad for this setup.

With xps (EDK 9.1 without any SPs) I've tried creating exact the same design.
So that exact the same kernel etc could be used for the both bitstreams.
And with the self-made one I see exact the same output with the only difference:

   root@192.168.119.11:~/netperf-2.4.1/src# ./netperf -l 30 -H 192.168.119.1 -i 10,
   2 -I 99,10 -t UDP_STREAM -- -m 32768 -s 262144
   UDP UNIDIRECTIONAL SEND TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 192.168.11
   9.1 (192.168.119.1) port 0 AF_INET : ±5.0% @ 99% conf.
   Socket  Message  Elapsed      Messages
   Size    Size     Time         Okay Errors   Throughput
   bytes   bytes    secs            #      #   10^6bits/sec

   217088   32768   30.00        9593      0      83.82
   107520           30.00        9586             83.76

:o(

Rebuilding the XAPP941 project with EDK 9.1.00 still leaves 230Mb/sec.
I also pulled the additional timing constraints from XAPP941's data/system.ucf
into the self-made data/system.ucf, but this haven't change anything.

I've run out of ideas, and switched from TEMAC to other Xilinx stuff for a while.


Thanks,
Andrei

_________________________________________________________________
Connect to the next generation of MSN Messenger 
http://imagine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/default.aspx?locale=en-us&source=wlmailtagline
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded