On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 21:49, Kumar Gala wrote:

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

I'm not terrible happy with blindly writing to rstcr.

I can understand you.
But I jut want to make things simple and workable.
Any idea?

one idea would be for us to add a property on the soc node.
Something like has-rstcr or something similar in a guts node?

I have seen your suggestion before to add a property in device

tree.

quoted

quoted

But I still think the current implementation is simple.

While it simple you are depending on the fact that a given
implementation may or may not have something at the particular
offset.  Who knows if 8599 or some future part could put the 'cause
my part to smoke and self-destruct' at the same offset in the  
future :)

quoted

Anyway, I can try your suggestion.

I'm thinking have a guts block and putting a property in it makes

the

quoted

most sense.

After some discussion on IRC I think the following is the suggested  
node we should add in.

guts@e00000 {
        compatible = "fsl,mpc8548-guts";
        reg = <e00000 1000>;

one more zero!

        fsl,has-rstcr;
};