=20
On May 29, 2007, at 1:23 PM, Jon Loeliger wrote:
=20

quoted

From: Jon Loeliger <redacted>

The 8641 RC poses as a transparent bridge, but does not=20

implement the

quoted

IO_BASE or IO_LIMIT registers in the config space.  This means that
the code which initializes the bridge resources ends up setting the
IO resources erroneously.

This change initializes the RC bridge resources from the=20

device tree.

quoted

Signed-off-by: Andy Fleming <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Jon Loeliger <redacted>

=20
Can this be merged with Zhang's "Set RC of mpc8641 to transparent =20
bridge for transfer legacy I/O access." patch since it pretty much =20
supersedes it.

I should be!=20
But why apply them sperately?=20
They refect differnet content and stage. For end user, they will only
see the unified code :-).
Roy