Re: 2.6.22-rc2 built on ppc
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: 2007-05-20 18:40:40
Segher Boessenkool wrote:
quoted
quoted
I don't know what's to blame for the warnings --- new gcc versions or the change from do { } while (0) to ((void)0)? Either way, the compiler should comprehend that the arguments stuffed into the dma_unmap_single macro are _not_ unused by accident; it should stay quiet and optimize the unused variables away if run with -Osomething.There is not much that the compiler can do by itself, since the macro expansion happens in the preprocessor.Even if the compiler could see that the variables are used as macro arguments, this doesn't automatically equate to it being able to infer the variables are unused on purpose.
Strange. I believe we had code before with variables that were only used in macros that expanded to <nil>, notably debug logging macros which were usually configured out. Perhaps I'm mistaken. -- Stefan Richter -=====-=-=== -=-= =-=-- http://arcgraph.de/sr/