Re: RFC: powerpc: Start splitting up mmu.h by MMU type
From: Kumar Gala <hidden>
Date: 2007-04-20 19:26:07
On Apr 19, 2007, at 7:56 PM, David Gibson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 07:11:07AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:quoted
On Apr 19, 2007, at 1:54 AM, David Gibson wrote:quoted
This patch makes a start to sorting out the tangled mess of MMU related header files in asm-powerpc, and weaning arch/powerpc off the remaining asm-ppc headers it uses. Specifically it splits the ppc64 specific (or more strictly, the 64-bit hash table specific) parts of asm-powerpc/mmu.h into its own file, asm-powerpc/mmu-hash64/mmu.h. Similarly, PowerPC 44x definitions are taken from asm-ppc/mmu.h, trimmed down for use in arch/powerpc and place in their own file, asm-powerpc/mmu-44x/mmu.h. mmu.h definitions for other 32-bit MMU types remain in asm-ppc/mmu.h for now, but should be likewise split into their own files.I asked this before, but why the need for a separate directory per mmu type? why not just include/asm-powerpc/mmu-44x.h?Because I have further patches in the works that add MMU specific versions of tlbflush.h, pgtable.h and so forth to the same directories.
Well I agree pgtable.h getting split wouldn't be a bad idea. But tlbflush.h is only 146 lines, splitting it doesn't seem worth the trouble. So having a mmu-44x, mmu-hash32, mmu-hash64, mmu-8xx, mmu- fsl_booke, mmu-40x for just two files seems a bit much.
I'm not wedded to the idea, but it seemed like a reasonable way to organize things.
- k